Women in STEM anthology: Call for submissions

Reposted from Finding Ada

Our first anthology of stories about women in STEM, A Passion for Science: Stories of Discovery and Invention, has been a fantastic success and it’s time to start thinking about the next one! To that end, we would like to invite you to submit an idea for articles about individual women or, especially, groups of women in:

  • Science
  • Medicine
  • Technology
  • Engineering
  • Maths
  • Pioneering users of technology

In the latter category, we’re after fascinating stories of women, individually or as part of a group, who played important roles as the users of technology, such as the women who ran the Doodson-Légé Tide Predicting Machine,or the women pilots of WWII.

We would like to get a fairly even distribution across the categories outlined above, but are also open to ideas that don’t fit in quite so neatly, so if you have an oddball idea, we want to hear it! Please also note that A Passion for Science featured quite a lot of astronomers, so we’re looking for a wider variety of sciences, and more women from the tech, eng, and maths categories, for this second book.

Initially, we would like you to send us 250 words on the woman or women that you want to write about, explaining why they are notable or interesting, along with a link to a sample of your writing. To submit your idea, please complete our form by 28 February 2014 and we’ll get back to you as soon as we can after that. The deadline for final submission is 30 April.

Ultimately, we’re looking for 20 articles of between 2,000 and 6,000 words. At this point, we don’t have a budget, but we’re hoping to raise some money to pay for editing, cover design and an honorarium for writers. Profits go towards supporting Ada Lovelace Day, which remains essentially a budgetless organisation run by a very small group of dedicated volunteers.

If you need a bit of inspiration, do take a look at some of the sample chapters from last year’s book. And if you want to know exactly what you’ll be getting yourself into, please take a look at our draft author notes and style guide.

Submit your abstract or find more information at http://findingada.com/book/call-for-submissions/

“A Place to Make Your Own”: Guest Blogger Lara Fields, BMC 2017, on the Women’s College Experience

Lara Fields“A women’s college is not only a place to receive a focused, supportive education or experience a community that inspires confidence and empowerment, but it is a place to make your own.”

In this guest blog post, freshman Lara Fields shares her first experiences of what the Bryn Mawr community has to offer. In the impression she paints, the supportive and open culture of Bryn Mawr encourages women to grow to their full potential, released from the stigma and pressure of the stereotypes that they so often fight in coeducational settings. Thank you, Lara, for sharing your gleanings from your first semester with us!

When I first arrived at Bryn Mawr, I heard a variety of newly minted freshmen admit that they never expected to attend a women’s college. I know it was something I found myself saying time and again, but I was surprised to hear that so many incoming students felt the same way. When I probed into why some felt the way they did, many expressed similar reasons behind their attitudes: they thought it would be socially and academically limiting.

It seems that in this age of coed higher education, the idea of attending a single sex school is not seriously considered by prospective female college students, in part, due to negative stigma associated with all female colleges. I know I was guilty of buying into the false stereotype that, nowadays, only aggressive, ultra feminist women seek out and attend single sex colleges, despite the fact that I had no real experience with anyone who had been through a single-sex education. When I look back on my attitude I feel ridiculous, but in my mind at the time I felt that without a large presence of male students, Bryn Mawr would be confining. I wanted the classic “college experience,” and I was not confident Bryn Mawr could give me what I thought I wanted. I have gradually realized that my negative attitude was strongly influenced by the fear of being labeled by individuals who were as ignorant as I was of the merits of a women’s education. Despite feeling trepidatious during the first week of school, since I have started my career at Bryn Mawr, I feel more confident, independent, and able to go about being myself without the fear of judgment or ridicule. However, I will readily admit that I am missing out on the typical “college experience,” which is in no way negative. Bryn Mawr, as a women’s college, offers opportunities that far out-weigh what many coed institutions can provide: a dynamic environment for young women, like myself, to grow academically, a safe and welcoming atmosphere that supports open dialogues about women’s issues, and a close-knit sisterhood of like-minded students that will follow graduates throughout their lives.

The role women’s colleges have played in offering intellectually stimulating environments for female students is as important in this day and age as it has been in decades past. Originally, a women’s college was usually the only avenue for academically gifted women to get a higher education, and is the reason for Bryn Mawr College’s existence. Because of its long history as a female-centric institution, Bryn Mawr has a tradition of providing a supportive, yet challenging academic experience specifically for women. Personally, the all-female environment has helped me take a more active role in my classes. In my high school there was a stigma that participating heavily in class meant you were “acting like a know it all” or trying to show off. Instead of animosity, there is a great degree of support offered by fellow students and faculty because it is recognized that the classroom is a place to express one’s ideas and opinions. It is clear that this supportive attitude has bred an environment that encourages intellectual curiosity and motivates students to pursue their academic passions. For instance, there is immense support for students who want to pursue traditionally male dominated fields like Math, Computer Science, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics. While I am personally interested in the humanities, I have many friends and classmates (including two of my roommates) who are studying math and science-heavy subjects, illustrating that this institution not only creates an intellectually challenging environment, but that it attracts women who are motivated to pursue a wide range of academics. I also know many students who are undecided about what they want to study because they have so many interests. Bryn Mawr’s faculty and advisors encourage their students’ exploration of the different academic options available because the school understands that, at this early stage in a student’s life, one might not have fully realized their academic passions. The diversity of interests within the student body at Bryn Mawr shows that there is no one academic area that women wish to pursue, and that no matter the subject, students here can follow their interests with support and encouragement.

The majority female student body also makes the ability to discuss women’s issues an easy and open experience, even in reference to issues seen as controversial like sexuality and female health. Back home I had many male and female friends joke that I would “turn into a lesbian” if I went to a women’s school. While there is a large lesbian population at Bryn Mawr, it’s not endemic of the sexual turning power of a women’s college, but the ability for students to be open about their sexual identity. A key quality of Bryn Mawr’s single-sex environment is that the student body can easily foster discussions concerning alternative sexuality without backlash, giving new students the ability to meet and interact with openly gay, bi-sexual, and transgendered students. In addition, because the student body is majority female, students can feel more comfortable about asking questions without feeling embarrassed or judged. This push for communication concerning alternative sexual and gender lifestyles has stripped the subject of its “taboo” on campus, allowing it to be a normal, accepted part of the social landscape of the college. On the same note, this open communicative approach epitomizes how female health is addressed in the college. Topics relating to sex, drinking, and assault are not hush hush, but widely discussed to give students the necessary information to make smart and informed decisions throughout their college experience. Copious resources are offered to allow students to make healthy decisions like supplying free condoms, providing free counseling sessions with campus psychologists, and establishing trust between public safety and students. Rather than hammering out rules enforcing “do’s” and “don’t’s” on campus, the administration focuses on ways to keep students safe without compromising our opportunities to participate in typical college activities. They trust that by laying out the facts and being communicative, students will make independent, adult decisions relating to safety and health. This trust is no less visible than between public safety officers and students. On Bryn Mawr’s campus, instead of feeling that public safety officers are people to avoid, students understand that if they get into trouble, officers are there to help, not hassle. This level of open communication and trust remains a profound aspect of the single sex environment of Bryn Mawr and should be taken as role model behavior by other institutions.

However, the most profound aspect of this all female institution is the lifelong sisterhood that will follow students after graduation. Already in my first month of school, I have developed friendships that are strong and close, and I cannot wait to explore them in the next four years. I have noticed that even with students I do not already know, there is an innate ease and camaraderie between us. So far, this welcoming spirit was most prominent during the celebrated Bryn Mawr tradition, Parade Night. Walking through the two lines of upperclassmen, with their well wishes, bright lanterns, and beaming faces gave me an intense sense of belonging. This feeling was enforced when, later that night, my roommates and I were visited by the students who had lived in our quad the year before. They were crying and telling us how lucky we were to be living in our room. They shared with us stories of their late night dance parties, the numerous crazy escapades, inside jokes, and overall happy memories they created in our dorm room. However, what was most touching was when they told the four of us, “we don’t know you guys yet, but we love you already! Our door is always open!” Before excusing themselves, they each gave us hugs, and eventually left the room skipping out. I don’t think I will ever forget that moment. Their sincerity showed me that these women had not only made Bryn Mawr their school, but their home, filled with the life long memories, warm emotions, and joyful insanity that I missed back home with my friends and family. I knew at that moment I had made the right decision to come Bryn Mawr.

What can be taken out of this essay is that a women’s college is not only a place to receive a focused, supportive education or experience a community that inspires confidence and empowerment, but it is a place to make your own. It is a place where you can be yourself, where you can squander the nights away with talking, shouting, and giggling. It is a place filled with personalities galore and a million opinions. It is a place where women can be women without defining what that means. It is a place where your friends are around one corner, and around the other corner. It is a place to make your own. It is a place one can call home.

Do you have thoughts about the place of the women’s college in the twenty-first century educational landscape? Have there been aspects of your experience that have shaped your understanding of education for women in the world today? Respond in the comments, or tweet us @GreenfieldHWE!

Call for Papers: International Federation for Research in Women’s History

book-stack-and-ereaderCall for papers: IFRWH Conference at Jinan, China, 27-29 August 2015

The next IFRWH conference will be held at Jinan, China in August 2015 in conjunction with the CISH conference (23-29 August). A number of themes and panels on women’s histories have been included in the main conference and that is a big step in taking women’s histories forward and a measure of the acknowledgment of the work of feminist historians.  The IFRWH conference will be held over one and half days at the end of the CISH conference, and will include a meeting at which the new officers and board of the Federation will be elected.

Based on the proposals that national committees originally put forward for the main CISH conference, and on consultation with the IFRWH board, we have decided on the following overarching theme for the conference:

Women and Modernity
The drive towards modernity has been one of the ways in which large-scale transformations in society in economic, political, and social have been pursued across the world over the last three centuries. The conceptual framework of modernity has straddled  diverse global locations. The tensions and conflicts in such broad-based changes encapsulate colonial and imperialist drives not only between the “west” and the “east,” but also within the “east” and the “south’. Women’s particular gendered experiences in nations and regions which have undergone these often rapid changes have led women to emerge as active agents, redefining/refining our notions of resistant subjectivities.
In order to maximize participation in the conference by delegates from all the different national committees of the IFRWH, we would also welcome proposals relating to these two conference sub-themes:

1.  Retrieving women’s histories from small archives and recently uncovered collections (including any period of historical enquiry)

2.  Resistant subjectivities

We hope you will be keen to participate in the IFRWH conference in this very important new location in China in 2015.

To download the conference paper/panel proposal form, click below.

Click Here for Paper/Panel Proposal Form

For more details, see the conference website: http://www.ifrwh.com/

Call for Submissions: Feral Feminisms

book-stack*Feral Feminisms CFP ISSUE 3 – Feminine Feelers Deadline – 15 March 2014*

*Feral Feminisms,* a new independent, inter-media, peer reviewed, open access online journal, invites submissions for a special issue entitled “Feminine Feelers,” guest edited by Zorianna Zurba. Submitted contributions
may include full-length academic essays (about 5000 – 7000 words), shorter creative pieces, cultural commentaries, or personal narratives (about 500 – 2500 words), poetry, photo-essays, short films/video (uploaded to Vimeo), visual and sound art (jpeg Max 1MB), or a combination of these.
*Please direct inquiries and submissions to Guest Editor, Zorianna Zurba.*

Prior to the recent Affective Turn in critical and cultural theory,
feminist theory and philosophy had already been critiquing the role of
rationality and the exclusion of emotion in Western thought. Elspeth Probyn
(1993) argued for the inclusion of experiential accounts in understanding
the relationship between feminist epistemology and ontology; and, Alison
Jaggar (1989) worked to restore inquiry as the wisdom of love to Western
epistemology by validating emotional acumen as a highly developed skill.
For Jaggar, the one who feels different is an emotional outlaw. Emotional
outlaws are a kind of precursor, grandmother or godmother, to Ahmed’s
(2010) affect aliens: the feminist killjoy, who is angered by the sexist
joke, or the melancholic migrant, who longs for something lost, or the
unhappy queer, whose happiness is already impossible. Claire Hemmings
(2012) has argued that being outside of emotional norms can offer a kind
of unification, where affective dissonance is a starting point for
feminist politics and can encourage affective solidarity.

But what of a return to previous conceptualizations of feeling in
understanding the feminine and feminism? Luce Irigaray (1991), for example,
writes of the erasure of the figure of the female lover and the
simultaneous loss of the expression of feminine carnality, female divinity,
and the representation of the female body. In light of these and other
recent works (Cvetkovich, 2012; Grosz, 2011), how might we consider moving
forward by taking into consideration feminine feelings?

Feminine Feelers are flustered, fraught, and feral. Feminine Feelers recall
feminine modalities of feeling that have gone otherwise. Feminine Feelers
ponder the position of emotional misfits such as female mystics, poets,
artist, grandmothers, godmothers, cyborgs, golems, lovers, and Other(ed)
figures. Feminine Feelers also highlight moments in feminist thought which
illuminate the role of feelings and accounts of the body. What challenges
does the turn to affect pose to feminist theory? How might we cultivate the
sensory in order to tune into what is going on? Is the female an outsider,
or is the feminist the outsider? How does outsider status offer a critical
distance from cultural and emotional hegemonies? Must this distance be
maintained in order to preserve difference?

This special issue of *Feral Feminisms* seeks to bring together scholars,
activists, and artists to think through and feel through categories.
Submitted contributions may include papers, visual art, film, poetry and
literary pieces. Submissions are encouraged to address, but are not limited to, the
following topics:

● Cults of the feminine
● Indigenous femininities
● Figures and examples: emotional outlaws, affect aliens, fantastic feelers
● Vocabularies of feeling
● Feminine and feminist genealogies
● Theoretical and methodological disjunctures within feminist and queer
phenomenology, affect studies,
cultural emotion studies, cultural anthropology
● Art and literature movements and their relationship to affects: the new
sincerity, Remodernism, etc.
● Edges, excesses, and limits of Feminine Feelers and feminine feelers
● Animality, feelings, and non-human animals

For submission guidelines, please see:
http://feralfeminisms.com/submission-guidelines/


visit our website: www.feralfeminisms.com
like us on facebook: www.facebook.com/feralfeminisms

Education and Development Conference

9th EDC – Education and Development Conference 2014book-stack
5-7 March 2014, Bangkok, Thailand
Bangkok, Thailand

Join us for our 9th Annual Education and Development Conference, an
innovative and exciting opportunity for individuals interested in education
and development Learn, share and network with prominent scholars and
professionals in the field.

Inquiries: contact@tomorrowpeople.org
Web address: http://www.ed-conference.org
Sponsored by: Tomorrow People Organization

Dear Scholars, Students, NGO and governmental representatives:

We are happy to announce EDC 2014, hosted by Tomorrow People Organization.
This highly exciting and challenging international Conference is intended to
be a forum, discussion and networking place for academics, researchers,
professionals, administrators, educational leaders, policy makers, industry
representatives, advanced students, and others interested in Education.

More specifically, it targets:

Scholars: Share your research, learn some new approaches, hear about others’
experiences and pass on your knowledge and experience.

Government officials and policy makers: Learn about the best practices,
educational development strategies and educational systems around the world;
network with other policy makers and NGOs working in the field of supporting
educational development.

NGOs: Network with other international NGOs, possible donors and colleagues
from around the world and share your achievements and strategies with
others.

Graduate students: Meet your colleagues from around the world, make new
friends, and improve your knowledge and communication skills.

Company representatives: This is a chance to improve your leadership skills,
learn more about the importance of permanent education in achieving the high
performances of your organization, meet your colleagues, exchange ideas and
establish new connections and partnerships.

Others: Anyone who is interested in making some positive changes around them
and gaining new knowledge, skills and friends and becoming more useful to
their own communities.

Education and Development Conference 2014 will provide unlimited resources
and opportunities to interact with prominent leaders in the field of
education and greatly expand on your global network of scholars and
professionals.

We welcome: ORAL, POSTER and VIRTUAL presentations. Early submissions are
strongly encouraged due to limited space in the venue, as applications are
reviewed on a rolling admission basis – as long as space is available.

The conference topics include, but are not limited to: Adult Education, Arts
Education, Anthropology and Education, Curriculum, Early Childhood
Education, Educational Systems and Policy, Educational Psychology,
Environmental Education, Gender and Education, Guidance and Counseling,
Health Education, Higher Education, History of Education, IT and Education,
Language Education and Literacy, Lifelong Learning, Mathematics Education,
Mentoring and Coaching, Multicultural Issues in Education, Philosophy of
Education, Physical Education, Primary Education, Quality in Education,
Race, Ethnicity and Education, Research and Development, Rural Education,
Science Education, Secondary Education, Sociology of Education, Special and
Inclusive Education, Teacher Education, Values and Education, Vocational
Education and Training, Other areas of Education.

Papers presented at the conference will be published in a dedicated ISBN
publication of EDC2014 Conference Proceedings.

We look forward to seeing you in Bangkok in March 2014, as one of our
participants, coming from over 60 countries worldwide!

Sincerely,

EDC 2014 Organizing Committee
Email: contact@tomorrowpeople.org

Call For Papers: Flying: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Kate Millett

book-stackFlying: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Kate Millett

30 May 2014
School of Arts
Birkbeck, University of London
Supported by Feminist Review Trust

Keynote: Victoria Hesford (SUNY Stony Brook University), author of Feeling
Women’s Liberation (Duke UP, 2013)

Papers are invited for an interdisciplinary conference dedicated to the work of Kate Millett. Millett became an iconic figure of second wave
feminism after the publication of Sexual Politics in 1970. As one of the
first pieces of academic feminism to come out of the American academy,
Sexual Politics was a handbook of the Women’s Liberation Movement.
Moreover, after appearing on the cover of Time Magazine in the same year as
Sexual Politics was published, Millett became one of the Movement’s most
recognizable faces. However, arguably, Millett has since largely
disappeared from both the public eye and contemporary feminism, despite the
fact that she has continued to publish (Flying [1974], The Prostitution
Papers [1975], The Loony-Bin Trip [1990], Sita [2000], and Mother Millet
[2001]), make films (Three Lives [1971], Not a Love Story [1981], The Real
Yoko Ono [2001]), and sculpt.

In aiming to reflect on/account for/address/redress some of this silence,
this conference is compelled on the one hand, by recent calls in feminism
to re-engage with the second wave (see Hemmings’ Why Stories Matter, Duke,
2011) and to re-visit foundational feminist texts (see Merck and Sanford’s
Further Adventures of the Dialectic of Sex, Palgrave, 2010). Moreover, it
is also influenced by Victoria Hesford’s recent Feeling Women’s Liberation
(Duke, 2013), which places Millett as a central figure in the production
and remembrance of the Women’s Liberation Movement. Hesford’s publication
signals that now is perhaps a timely moment to create a larger dialogue
about Millett; to ask questions about Millett’s role in feminist history;
and to discuss how her work is situated in and amongst more contemporary
feminist concerns. The conference thus aims to: consider new frameworks for
approaching Millett’s past or ongoing work; interrogate the politics and
possibilities of the second wave; explore the politics of memory,
forgetting, and citation in feminism; critically reflect on the potential
difficulties of some of Millett’s past work travelling into the present;
and to consider whether and how (despite her ongoing feminist work) Millett
might be produced as ‘untimely’ in the feminist present. Topics might
include, but are not limited to:

Affect and the second wave
Feminism and autobiographical writing
Feminism and forgetting
Feminist film-making
Generational politics or the politics of mother/daughter relationships
Lesbian politics and the Women’s Liberation Movement
Narrating mental illness
Non-monogamy as feminist politics
Race and feminism
Sexuality and the second wave
Sexual Politics and feminist literary criticism
The media and the second wave
The Women’s Liberation Movement

The conference invites proposals for individual papers, panels, or artistic
responses from any discipline and theoretical perspective. Submissions are
welcome from students, activists, artists, academics, and unaffiliated
researchers. Please send a title and 300 word abstract for a 20 minute
paper along with your name, affiliation (if applicable), and 100 word
bibliography to s.mcbean@bbk.ac.uk by 28 February 2013.

The conference is organized by Dr Sam McBean (Birkbeck, University of
London) and is being supported by the Feminist Review Trust.

Select papers will be sought for publication as part of an edited
collection. For further information please email Sam at s.mcbean@bbk.ac.uk

Conference website: flyingkatemillettconference.wordpress.com

Writing the Collective Record: on Delving into Wikipedia

Featured

Bryn Mawr Special Collections is jumping on the edit-a-thon bandwagon!

Staff members participating in the edit-a-thon, January 10th 2013

Staff members participating in the edit-a-thon, January 10th 2013

This past Friday, we held a small trial run Wikipedia edit-a-thon: a gathering at which people work on adding to or editing articles on the encyclopedia website, often organized around a specific topic. The goal of the endeavor is multifaceted: we want to add information pertinent to our collections in order to increase awareness of our holdings; to improve general knowledge by enhancing existing articles with additional information; and to add to the global body of accessible knowledge on women and women’s history. I have begun writing a new article for Hilda Worthington Smith (not yet posted), a Bryn Mawr alumna who played a lead role in The Summer School for Women Workers in Industry in the 1920s and ’30s. Other colleagues added new articles, improved existing articles by adding links to our holdings, and interlinked between articles. This initial trial helped us to to gauge the challenges, feasibility, and possible benefits of holding similar events in the future with a broader group of participants.

Courtesy Wikipedia.org

Courtesy of Wikipedia.org

Why Wikipedia? Surely there are other channels by which we might accomplish these goals–channels that are more reputable, or more specialized. Our alumnae, for instance, would be more likely to read about highlights from our collections through the Alumnae Bulletin, researchers can find us through networks of finding aids and citations, and anybody with an internet connection can browse the Triptych and Triarte databases to view the art objects, images, and documents that we hold. But the draw of Wikipedia isn’t specialization–it’s precisely the opposite.

With the abundance of information available on the internet growing every second, people are relying increasingly on powerful aggregators like Google and sites like Wikipedia which provide a centralized source for general knowledge. This is valuable and useful, but also cause for concern. As the amount of information covered by these tools grows, they take on the illusion of completeness. The phenomenon is summed up aptly by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales with the “Google test: ‘If it isn’t on Google, it doesn’t exist.'” (If a tree falls in a forest…) If it doesn’t exist on Wikipedia, the public perception is that it must not be very important.

Professors are notoriously uneasy with their students’ reliance on Wikipedia, and have been known to decry its democratic structure as a free-for-all for self-appointed journalists spreading unreliable information. While the concern may be overblown (the site actually has strict rules about citation and regularly cleans out content of poor quality), it is true that Wikipedia is only as reliable as those who participate in writing and editing it. Like all sources, its assertions should be interrogated rather than blindly accepted. The legitimate fear is not that it is fallible, but that its readers will forget that it is so. Once we recognize it as an incomplete, WikiGlobesoccasionally inaccurate, and highly mutable record, the conversation becomes much more interesting. If it is not a record of “everything,” what is it a record of? The diagram on the right is my interpretation of what it looks like to begin to refine our understanding of Wikipedia’s relation to wider cultural knowledge. I have never spoken to a person who actually believes the statement in stage 1, but my perception is that many people are stuck at stages 3 and 4. Versions of the statement in stage 5 have recently emerged at the center of dialogue in feminist and digital communities about the role that Wikipedia plays in our cultural knowledge, the assertion among feminists being that it both reinforces systemic problems and also provides opportunities for reform, which it becomes our responsibility to take.

While Bryn Mawr Special Collections will use the site to provide better access to our collections in general, the edit-a-thons also align particularly with the mission of The Greenfield Digital Center to build recognition of women in digital spaces. It is important to ensure that women and minority voices have a presence on Wikipedia, simply because it is so many people’s main reference for information–otherwise we risk losing sight of them entirely. Last Fall, our former Director Jennifer Redmond led a history class through the process of improving the Wikipedia article for M. Carey Thomas, demonstrating the incompleteness of what some view as the “official” record and the importance of taking the steps we can to fill in the gaps.

Filipacchio_OpEd

Filipacchio’s New York Times Op-Ed

The volume of the conversation around gender in Wikipedia rose to a new pitch in April 2013 when Amanda Filipacchi noticed a disturbing trend: Wikipedia editors were gradually moving women from the general “American Novelists” listing to a marginal sub-category called “American Women Novelists,” leaving the original list, with name still ungendered, exclusively male. This observation raised crucial questions about the visibility of marginalized groups and the responsibility of editors and others to consciously address these problems. Her article, and the flood of ensuing coverage, brought new focus to a conversation about the under-representation of women on the site–both as subjects of content and in their roles as contributors. (A useful summary of the conversation can be found here.) The dialogue became an opportunity to reflect on the systemic nature of sexism, and the insidious feedback loop between structural problems in society and sources like Wikipedia: culture reinforces its imbalances by creating a record that reflects them, replicating the existing flaws like mutated DNA as it constantly remakes itself in the image of the problematic record. In other words, rather than a record of the world itself, Wikipedia serves as a mirror of our worldview with the power to either perpetuate or transform the problems it contains.

Courtesy of Postcolonial Digital Humanities, http://dhpoco.org

Courtesy of Postcolonial Digital Humanities, http://dhpoco.org

The Importance of Participation: the best way to fix it is to get our feet wet and address the matter at the source of the controversy, and organized efforts like The Rewriting Wikipedia Project are taking the reigns. The under-representation of women, gender non-conforming individuals, people of color, and others on Wikipedia is a site-specific manifestation of a universal problem. By adding to and editing Wikipedia, therefore, we address two areas in need of change: we fill in the gaps that exist between the site and our culture, adding in those who have been left out of the encyclopedia but have achieved recognition by society outside the digital realm. (Examples include the women mentioned in this article who have won prestigious STEM awards but go unrecognized on Wikipedia). Additionally, in adding in those who have been neglected either on the site or in general society, we take steps towards correcting those lacks in the culture itself, from beyond and before Wikipedia: we reassert the importance and visibility of the marginalized, affirming their place in history and their right to be known. Because of its open structure, Wikipedia is more than just a mirror of the status quo: it is also a potential locus of powerful change.

Therefore, edit! Setting up a Wikipedia account is easy. Learning the editing protocol is a little bit more of an investment, but can be easily covered within an hour. By taking an organized approach to adding information into the site we can support each other as we learn how to edit, ask questions about material and learn about the collections, and make a difference in the visibility of Bryn Mawr’s remarkable collections and of women’s accomplishments in history. Edit-a-thons have been picking up all over the world, with growing frequency in past years, and we plan on holding another one in March to coincide with a Seven Sisters series of edit-a-thons for Women’s History Month. In the meantime, we will be publicizing and participating in events like the upcoming Art and Feminism edit-a-thon* on Saturday, February 1st, in order to continue to get our feet wet and learn the ins and outs of the site.

If you’re interested in getting involved with a future event, please write to us at GreenfieldHWE@brynmawr.edu and follow us on Twitter! @GreenfieldHWE

*Update: remote participants are more than welcome at edit-a-thons, but if you’re in a major city chances are good that you could participate in the Art and Feminism edit-a-thon in person. More fun and usually free food! Check this page for a full listing of participating organizations to see if there is someone hosting a gathering near you.

Call For Applications: Sophia Smith Collection and Smith College Archives Research Support Programs

pages-flipThe Sophia Smith Collection and the Smith College Archives at Smith College are pleased to offer four annual research support programs: the Margaret Storrs Grierson Scholars-in-Residence Awards, the Caroline D. Bain Scholars-in-Residence Awards, the Friends of the Smith College Library (FSCL) Scholars-in-Residence Awards, and the Travel-to-Collections Fund. Grierson, Bain, and FSCL Scholars will receive awards of $2500, intended to support research visits of four to six weeks. For smaller projects, researchers should apply for Travel-to-Collection funds.

We welcome applications from faculty members, independent scholars, and graduate students who live at least 50 miles from Northampton, Massachusetts, and whose research interests and objectives would be significantly advanced by extended research in the holdings of either the Sophia Smith Collection or the Smith College Archives.

Bain, Grierson, and FSCL scholars will be expected to give a work-in-progress colloquium to the Smith College community during their residency. It is expected that at some later time they will send the Sophia Smith Collection and the College Archives a copy of the final results of their research, whether in published or unpublished form.

We encourage potential applicants to contact our reference archivists to inquire about the relevance of our collections for their projects before submitting their proposals. Reference queries can be made online or by calling (413) 585-2970.

Applications for the Bain, Grierson, or FSCL Scholars-in-Residence Fellowships should include six copies * of the following: 1) the completed cover sheet (print out the cover sheet page and complete it by hand); 2) a proposal not exceeding six double-spaced pages, in 12-pitch font; and 3) a curriculum vitae. The proposal should describe the research to be undertaken and its relationship to current research in the field, the holdings to be consulted and their significance to the work, and the current status of the project as well as your plans and schedule for completing it. Two letters of recommendation (one copy of each), clearly indicating the applicant’s name and project title, should be sent under separate cover.

All applicants will be considered for the Bain, Grierson, and FSCL fellowships; you need only submit one application.

Applications must be postmarked by February 15th. Awards will be announced April 1st.

Travel-to-Collections funds are available to offset travel expenses of researchers engaged in a study that would benefit from access to the holdings at Smith College. We also welcome and encourage requests from researchers at the pre-proposal stage who would like to survey our holdings as they formulate their research agendas. We review applications for these funds once each year. Applications should be postmarked by February 15th. Awards will be announced April 1st.

Applicants for Travel-to-Collections funds should submit six copies * of the following: 1) a curriculum vita; 2) a letter outlining their research interests and needs; and 3) a proposed budget (not to exceed $1000) for travel and accommodations. We do not cover costs for meals, photocopies or other research-related costs. Graduate students should also arrange for two letters of recommendation (one copy of each, to be sent either with the application or separately) that speak to their scholarly experience, ability and promise.

http://www.h-net.org/announce/show.cgi?ID=208682

Call For Papers: Journal of Educational Policies and Current Practices

library imageThe Journal of Educational Policies and Current Practices (JEPCP)  is an international peer-reviewed journal, published semi-annually. The Institute of Language and Communications Studies and the Macro World Publishing jointly edit the journal.
The Journal of Educational Policies and Current Practices (JEPCP) is a refereed journal aims to shape an interdisciplinary field of inquiry and seek innovative research issues related to language, education, applied linguistics, language teaching, language learning. Particularly, it focuses on enriching language and educational policy knowledge base and practicing them at different levels. Moreover, it centers on their consequences for the theory, policy and practice of a variety of fields such as education, economy, sociology, and all other related fields. Therefore we seeks scholars, students, specialists, policy-makers and individuals from each field that use qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method in their articles and book reviews on language and educational policy related to a variety of disciplines and educational settings. The Journal advocates bringing together researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to enhance ideas and practices in learning and teaching.

Individuals are encouraged to submit papers in the following areas but not limited to:
educational policies and approaches
literacy policies,
linguistic and cultural socialization and schooling;
educational policies and practices;
educational practices
the role of ideologies in educational language policies.
development, implementation and effects of language policies
Submissions of paper proposals should be made to web: www.inlcs.org/journals

JEPCP Editorial Office
jepcp@inlcs.org

Submission and Publication Information:
Submission deadline: 14 February 2014
First round decisions announced: 7 March 2014
Authors submit revised manuscripts: 23 May  2014
Final decisions reached: 13 June 2014
Approximate date of publication: July, 2014
Number of papers: 5 to 7 papers

Editor-In-Chief
Margaret-Mary Sulentic Dowell
Louisiana State University, USA
ISSN: 2147-3501
Publication Frequency: Semi-annual

Perspectives on Gender and Product Design: Are we living in a ‘man-made’ world?

book-stack-and-ereaderSubmission Deadline: January 17th, 2014

Notification of Acceptance/Rejection: February 10th, 2014
Workshop Date & Location: Saturday April 26th 2013, Toronto, Canada

 

***************

Technology has a profound mediating effect on the way we obtain and contribute to knowledge, relate to each other and contribute to society. Given the impact and potential ramifications of technology on society, it is imperative that we understand, accommodate and integrate both men and women’s  perspectives in shaping our modern day technologies. This workshop focuses on the representation of women’s perspectives in technologies that we design, analyze, and use.

There are many barriers to getting feminine perspectives into system designs: 

  • the lack of discussion regarding gender politics in the fields related to technology design, including the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI) whose very charter is to be “user-centric”
  • low grant support for research which looks at the representation of women’s perspectives in our current discourse, which in turn leads to a lack of reliable, informative and actionable technology & gender research 
  • the lack of focus on production of gender-agnostic design/development environments, including software tools and collaborative design/development settings
  • low representation of women in senior positions within the technology sector and within fields related to technology production, including computer science and engineering

This workshop will address these barriers with respect to the tools, technologies, and processes we experience and design.

To participate, please submit a 1-3 page position paper detailing your background, and interest, and experience in this topic. Participants will be selected on the basis of their potential to contribute to the overall discussion and the workshop goals.

See original posting and further details at:
https://sites.google.com/site/technologydesignperspectives/home